शनिवार, 20 जुलाई 2013

Girl child, a load to unburden - The Hindu

Girl child, a load to unburden - The Hindu

Girl child, a load to unburden

C. Radhika
Everyone rally around
The expectant mother
When it is the delivery
Of the first baby.
Congratulations and smiles
Gifts and sweets
Follow the baby
The child and mother
Pampered.
Because it’s a boy.
It’s a baby girl
Still, the parents grin
Showing they don’t care
If it’s a son or daughter
But with the secret hope
That there is always
A second chance.
And when it is a girl
Even the second time
There is sorrow
Frustration follows.
Wanting a boy
A girl is born.
Unwanted, unloved.
The mother and daughter
Uncared, shunned
By family, society
The father detached
His heredity doomed
Only, only if I had a son
He thinks
My problems solved
My prestige restored.
Can I take a chance?
For a third child
The father thinks
Maybe, luck will favour
And a son be born.
After all, son
Is a son for ever
And a daughter,
A load to unburden.
(The writer’s email: radhika_writer@yahoo.co.in

Game changer or spoiler? - The Hindu

Game changer or spoiler? - The Hindu

Game changer or spoiler?

SUJAY MEHDUDIA
SHARE  ·   PRINT   ·   T+  

While policymakers consider exploring shale gasto meet energy security goals, questions are being raised if it will drive India towards a serious water scarcity situation

Look before you leap:The file photo shows workers preparing drilling equipment at a shale gas fracking facility in Poland.
Look before you leap:The file photo shows workers preparing drilling equipment at a shale gas fracking facility in Poland.
India’s move for exploiting shale gas resources in the country has been red-flagged by The Energy and Resources Institute stating that in a water-stressed country like ours, rapidly approaching water scarcity conditions, the results might not be as dynamic as it had proved for the U.S. 
The latest policy brief “Shale Gas in India: Look Before You Leap” explores the question of shale gas being a game changer in the context of India. It explains the nature of shale gas, the technology for its extraction from underground sources, and its potential for India. It also highlights overseas acquisitions of this resource by Indian companies even before it is sourced domestically, and then examines the viability of the technology in India. One of the key determinants of the viability of this technology is the availability of large quantities of clean water. The policy brief points out that conventional gas can occur by itself or in association with oil. Coal bed methane (CBM), which is extracted from coal beds, is also an unconventional gas and, in terms of depth, occurs much closer to the land surface than other similar gases. 
However, shale rock is sometimes found 3,000 metres below the surface. Therefore, after deep vertical drilling, there are techniques to drill horizontally for considerable distances in various directions to extract the gas-rich shale. A mixture of water, chemicals, and sand is then injected into the well at very high pressures (8,000 psi) to create a number of fissures in the rock to release the gas. The process of using water for breaking up the rock is known as ‘hydro-fracturing’ or ‘fracking’. The chemicals help in water and gas flow and tiny particles of sand enter the fissures to keep them open and allow the gas to flow to the surface. This injection has to be done several times over the life of the well.
The number of wells to be drilled for shale gas far exceeds the number of wells required in the case of conventional gas and the land area required is a minimum of 80 to 160 acres.
The other interesting contribution to shale gas development in the U.S. is the export of guar gum from India, which helps in improving the viscosity and flow of water in the fracking process. The gum is extracted from guar ki phalli , grown mainly by farmers in Rajasthan and Haryana. Earlier, guar gum was used mainly as an additive in ice creams and sauces, but with the discovery of its use in shale gas extraction, its production has risen enormously, earning almost $5 billion during the period from April 2012 to January 2013.
The Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (MoPNG) has identified six basins as potentially shale gas bearing. These are Cambay, Assam-Arakan, Gondwana, Krishna-Godavari, Kaveri and the Indo-Gangetic plain. In a study conducted by the United States Geological Survey (USGS), recoverable resources of 6.1 tcf have been estimated in three out of 26 sedimentary basins. India had also put out in 2012, a draft policy for the exploration and exploitation of shale gas, inviting suggestions from the general public, stakeholders, environmentalists, etc.
Water issues
The policy is being considered by a group of ministers. The draft policy has identified some of the water issues in the exploitation of shale gas. Optimal exploitation of shale gas/oil requires horizontal and multilateral wells and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing treatments of stimulate oil and gas production from shale. This may require large volume of water 3-4 million gallons per well (11,000 to 15,000 cubic metres of water required for drilling/hydro fracturing depending upon the well type and shale characteristics).
The water after hydraulic fracturing is flowed back to the surface and may have high content of Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) and other contaminants (typically contains proppant (sand), chemical residue occur in many geologic formation, mainly in shale). The possibility of contamination of aquifier (both surface and subsurface) from hydro-fracturing and fracturing fluid disposal and the need for safeguarding the aquifer is the need of the hour.
The government’s draft policy suggests that there should be a mandatory rainwater harvesting provision in the exploration area, which trivialises the extent to which water will be required. It states, as far as possible, river, rain or non-potable ground water only should be utilised for fracking and re-use/recycling of water should be the preferred method for water management. The environmental concerns in using water for fracking have been considerably downplayed and their significance underestimated. Further, enforcing legislation on environmental and water issues is a problem in India, and such legislation has been more in breach than in observance.
India suffers from physical and economic water scarcity whereas the U.S. and Europe do not have the same water worries. The website Indiawaterportal.org points out that in the next 12-15 years, while the consumption of water will increase by over 50 per cent, the supply will increase by only 5 to 10 per cent, leading to a water scarcity situation.
TERI’s own study in 2010, ‘Looking Back to Think Ahead’, demonstrates that India is already a water-stressed country and is fast approaching the scarcity benchmark of 1,000 m3 per capita with unabated growth in the irrigation sector; again, it is evident that potential shale gas bearing areas, such as Cambay, Gondwana, Krishna-Godavari, and the Indo-Gangetic plains are also areas that will experience severe water stress by 2030.
Shale gas basins
It points out that land acquisition is not covered in the shale gas policy, but will be a serious issue because of the large area required for fracking and the consequent displacement of people. When the government invites bids, they are expected to cover three major basins, i.e., Cambay, Krishna-Godavari, and Raniganj (Damodar basin). According to the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC), there are about 34 tcf of shale gas in the Damodar basin alone (compared to India’s total conventional gas reserves of 47 tcf) of which 8 tcf are recoverable.
While the potential shale gas reserves overshadow those of conventional gas, we have a long way to go in identifying shale gas rich basins and acquiring the necessary technology and experience to extract shale gas. Meanwhile, the water situation will only get worse due to the reducing availability of fresh drinking water year by year, dropping groundwater levels, and the increasingly polluted rivers and other water bodies. Unless, there is some revolutionary technological breakthrough, which does not need the use of fresh water and chemicals, it is vital that we seriously ask ourselves this question: Should we further endanger a rapidly depleting resource on which all life depends? The answer should be a resounding “NO”, and instead the focus must be on removing the bottlenecks in CBM exploration and production while safeguarding the environment.

Turning garbage into gas - The Hindu 18 July 2013

Turning garbage into gas - The Hindu

Turning garbage into gas

PREM SHANKAR JHA
SHARE  ·   COMMENT (43)   ·   PRINT   ·   T+  

While incineration endangers lives, gasification will produce transport fuel that can meet half of India’s consumption needs

Delhi’s Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit has been at her wits’ end on how to dispose of the city’s ever growing mountain of garbage. Rising population and growing affluence have raised the daily outpouring of refuse to more than 8,000 tonnes, while simultaneously pushing up the cost of land to astronomical levels. The result: Delhi has run out of land for landfills, and none of the neighbouring States intends to surrender any to meet its needs.
The obvious answer to Delhi’s problem seems to be to burn the solid waste. Cities all over the world are doing it, so why can’t Delhi follow suit? In 2006, the Delhi Municipal Corporation proposed that a small, mothballed, waste incineration plant at Timarpur, that had been put to work for altogether five days since it was built in the 1980s, be reopened to convert 214,000 tonnes of solid waste a year into 69,000 tonnes by sifting out inorganic matter, and drying and palletising the rest to increase its fuel value. Burning this garbage, it was estimated, would produce six megawatts of power per hour, or 5.5 billion units of electricity a year.
The proposal never took off, but it became the springboard for a private sector grab at Delhi’s garbage — investors figured their income would come from the highly inflated tariff decreed by the Central government for ‘green’ energy and the carbon credits they would earn by reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Their plans are close to maturing. In her 2013-14 budget speech, Ms Dikshit announced that the city already has one incineration plant at Okhla, burning almost 2,000 tonnes a day, and that two more are being set up to incinerate another 4,300 tonnes a day. What’s more, these plants will generate 50 MW of power every hour of the day. More incineration plants are on their way: since the Okhla plant went on stream, the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests has approved eight more plants in various cities.
There is, however, a catch. Incinerating garbage in Delhi will cost an estimated 200,000 ragpickers their jobs. Throughout the world, moreover, countries are closing incineration plants owing to the hazard they pose to human health. The threats come from particulate emissions that greatly exacerbate lung diseases from bronchitis and asthma to emphysema and lung cancer, and from dioxins and furans in addition to the usual nitrogen and sulphur oxide gases in the flue gas.

THE DIOXIN THREAT

To residents of Indian cities who have become inured to dust, smoke, diesel fumes, as well as lead and nitrous oxide poisoning, this may sound like just one more addition to the long list of risks they face in their daily lives. But dioxins belong to another level of threat altogether. The word is a generic term for more than a hundred long lasting chemicals that are produced by burning municipal and medical waste and by a few industrial processes. Dioxins are insoluble in water and when they settle on land and water bodies, they are absorbed in their entirety by terrestrial and aquatic vegetation. They travel up the food chain into animals and fish that feed on plants and thence into humans. Since living organisms cannot metabolise them, they are found in very high concentrations in meat, fish, milk and eggs. In human beings, a prolonged exposure to dioxins — through a ‘rich diet’ — impairs the functioning of the liver and the immune and reproductive systems, and raises the incidence of cancer. In sum, dioxins shorten our lifespan. Men have no way of expelling them. Women can, but only by passing them to foetuses in their wombs or breast-feeding their babies.
Not surprisingly, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which put together the first comprehensive report on dioxins in 1994, described them as “the most poisonous substances known to man.” In Finland, the government has ordered shut an incineration plant built with the most elaborate safeguards when it found, after two years of its operation, that dioxin levels in the surrounding vegetation had risen by 15 to 25 per cent within a distance of 4 km from the plant.
Whenever environmentalists have pointed these hazards out to the Delhi government, its officials and company representatives have assured them that elaborate safeguards have been incorporated into the design of the plants to ensure that they meet prescribed safety norms. But subsequent tests have falsified this claim. In tests carried out at Okhla last year, particulate emissions exceeded norms on four occasions and stayed within them only on six. A test carried out in May 2013 revealed dioxins and furans emissions from its two chimney stacks to be 2.8 and 12.7 times the prescribed maximum!
In the face of such facts, the Delhi government has merely reaffirmed its determination to go ahead with setting up the incineration plants. This has led to the usual accusations of corruption and crony capitalism, but in this case the cause probably lies in two preconceptions that are deeply imbedded in the public mindset. First, that garbage is simply a nuisance and has no economic value whatever; second, since the physical sorting of household refuse is not feasible in India, incineration is the only way out.
Both assumptions reflect the casual ignorance of decision-makers. There is a third way of disposing garbage that not only eliminates all pollutants, but turns garbage into gold. This is to gasify garbage. Gasification is an incomplete combustion of organic matter that replaces a large part of the carbon dioxide we get from combustion with carbon monoxide and hydrogen. These two gases are, and have been for a hundred years, the basic building blocks of the world’s petrochemicals industry. They are also ideal for driving gas turbines to generate power. From India’s perspective, their best feature is the ease with which they can be synthesised into any transport fuel one desires, and into Di Methyl Ether, a condensate gas that is a superior diesel substitute and a complete substitute for Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG).
Gasification also eliminates the threat from dioxins. When gasification is carried out with oxygen, it produces only seven per cent of the flue gas obtained from combustion. The reaction takes place, moreover, at such high temperatures —1000 to 3,000 degrees Celsius — that dioxins and furans get broken down into their basic elements, losing their toxicity. The release of dioxins from a 24 tonne-per-day plasma gasification plant that has been running for more than a decade in Yoshii, Japan, has been found to be less than one per cent of that released by corresponding incineration plants. Consequently, city and municipal corporations around the world have begun to switch to gasification. According to the U.S.-based Recovered Energy Inc., a turnkey engineering company specialising in renewable energy projects, there are 200 Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) gasification plants under construction or in operation globally, of which half use the revolutionary new technology called plasma gasification.

ISOLATED VENTURES

Ironically, India already has employed plasma gasification technology — for the past four years, two 68 tonnes-a-day commercial plants employing this technology have been disposing of medical and other hazardous wastes in Pune and Nagpur. Since Indian states do not share information, however, these have remained isolated ventures.
At present, most MSW gasification plants abroad produce electricity. But this is giving way to the production of transport fuels. British Airways is partnering Solena, a U.S.-based biofuels company, to set up a plant that will gasify 1,300 tonnes a day of London’s solid waste to produce 16 million gallons of Aviation Turbine Fuel and 9 million gallons of naphtha in addition to generating up to 40 MW of power. This plant is expected to meet two per cent of British Airways’ global demand for jet fuel. Solena has won contracts for similar plants with Qantas, Lufthansa and SAS. Lufthansa’s plant will have a modification that New Delhi will do well to take note of: instead of naphtha, it intends to produce 9 million tonnes of diesel fuel.
India stands therefore at a crossroads. In 10 years from now, 600 million Indians will be living in cities with more than a million inhabitants who generate at least 600,000 tonnes of garbage a day. Incinerating this garbage will endanger the lives of future generations. Alternatively, this is sufficient to produce more than 35 million tonnes of transport fuel a year and meet half of India’s current consumption of the same. The saving in foreign exchange will lift the threat of a foreign exchange crisis forever. It will also free domestic prices from the yoke of international oil prices forever. And it will do all this without requiring a rupee of subsidies.
(The writer is a senior journalist)

शनिवार, 29 जून 2013

caughtSNAPPING - The Hindu

caughtSNAPPING - The Hindu
Don’t know whether to laugh at the irony captured in this image or to cry over the exploitation of the meek animal.Bhim Singh Rawat of Sanjay Colony, Safiabad Road, Narela, has sent in this entry.
Don’t know whether to laugh at the irony captured in this image or to cry over the exploitation of the meek animal.Bhim Singh Rawat of Sanjay Colony, Safiabad Road, Narela, has sent in this entry.

WIN A PRIZE

Readers are encouraged to send in their sightings: bloopers, UFOs or anything out of the ordinary they have snapped. Send your photographs to
delhimetroplus@gmail.com
titled CaughtSnapping along with a caption, your address and contact number. The best photograph featured in this column wins a prize every week.

रविवार, 23 जून 2013

Human endeavours gone wrong - The Hindu

Human endeavours gone wrong - The Hindu

Human endeavours gone wrong

MANOJ MISRA
SHARE  ·   PRINT   ·   T+  

The devastating Uttarakhand floods have one again proved that taming natural forces through human interventions is all buta myth

The devastation:The Govindghat area partly submerged in the flooded Alaknanda river in Chamoli district.PHOTO:PTI
The devastation:The Govindghat area partly submerged in the flooded Alaknanda river in Chamoli district.PHOTO:PTI
A great tragedy has befallen thousands of Char Dham yatris and many others in Uttarakhand, the full enormity of which is still to unfold despite some disturbing vivid footage beaming out of the television screens. But the blame game has begun. And since the easiest and most convenient to blame is ‘nature’, so most have gotten busy lamenting the nature’s fury without even trying to grapple with the root cause, where hopefully measures to prevent such recurrences could be found.
Let me try and explain such extreme natural events.
High and low ambient temperatures in summers and winter months result in heat ( loo ) and cold waves respectively. High to very high rainfall in catchments result in floods in rivers during monsoon time. All very natural and periodic, and yet why is our response to these natural events so very different?
We deal with the heat wave in summer time and cold wave in winters to our best abilities and within means available to us without much murmur. This is because we have taken for granted these two to be natural annual phenomenon that we must learn to live with their concomitant but temporary inconveniences.
But come floods in rivers and we seem to forget the fundamental truth of dealing with such climatic situations and temporary inconveniences. This is because a ‘mistaken’ human technological endeavour in form of structures on the rivers has mainstreamed the thought that since rivers can be tamed ( sic ), thus dealing with floods need no longer be even a short term inconvenience. With such thoughts in ascendance, the time tested and socially respected land use principles and classifications of khadar(flood plain) and bangar (very high flood zones) were thrown out of the window. Construction of dams, barrages and embankments on and along the rivers became the norm. But if we had thus really fixed the flood challenge, then why has the flood prone area in the country seen, over the decades since Independence, a massive increase from five per cent to 12 per cent, rather than a net decrease? Why do tragedies like Uttarakhand in 2013 (Ganga and Yamuna) and Bihar in 2008 (Kosi) still visit us?
The fact is that the dams, barrages and embankments on one hand, magnify the enormity of high floods when they come and on the other, instil a false sense of security in minds of those who come to occupy the erstwhile khadar lands that all is well. The truth is the opposite. Only normal and periodic climatic events have been converted into man-made disasters, with man coming to colonise khadar lands in plains and fragile river valleys and slopes in the hills, with impunity. ‘Nature’ is then often during high floods conveniently blamed for a calamitous situation which is essentially man-induced with subsequent flood relief becoming a money spinner for the clever.
In our vanity, we have also lost track of the irreplaceable benefits resulting from floods in the rivers. But for these very floods, wherefrom would have come the rich soils which form the backbone of the food security of our country? Or the periodic recharge of our aquifers and well being of our wells and ponds? Wherefrom the flushing away of all the muck that we have no qualms in putting into our rivers? Wherefrom would have come our rich deltas, coastline fisheries and mangrove forests and the biodiversity thriving in them?
So where do we go from here?
First of all we must accept that floods in rivers are natural climatic events resulting from high rains and these shall come and go with little or no harm if we treat them as mere natural and inevitable events and let them and our rivers be, just like we have come to accept and deal from time to time with heat and cold waves.
Then the time tested traditional concept and practices relating to Khadar and Bangar lands must be legislatively established. Policies and laws must ensure identification and delimitation of 100-year, 50-year and 10-year flood plains, as well as fragile river valleys in hills, with strict regulations in place on prohibited and permitted land use/s in these flood and fragile zones.
A move was initiated way back in 2002 by the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests to formulate such a regulatory framework called RRZ (River Zone Regulation) but which, for reasons best known to the powers that be, remain under wraps, must be unveiled in an urgent manner in the interest of both of the people and the river. It is a sad commentary that what the lawmakers and the executives should have done long back, is now left to the National Green Tribunal to rein in the brazen abuse by the land sharks of the Yamuna flood plains in the National Capital Region and beyond.
On hindsight, we believe that at least some of the recent tragedies in Uttarakhand resulting from improper use of fragile hill slopes on the banks of Ganga and Yamuna, would have been prevented if the RRZ had been in place to prohibit and regulate such self-defeating misuse of river banks.
(The writer is the Convener of the Yamuna Jiye Abhiyaan)